Author: Goodreads

Ghosts by Paul Auster
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Took me three days to read this novel. Blame it on the weekend—I’m busier on weekends. Blame video games, football games, other distractions. Blame City of Glass, which impressed me in no way. Blame mostly this so-called existentialism. I guess I just don’t get it. I take no pride in that ignorance, you know. Ghosts is sixty pages of I don’t know what. (Is that even a novel. Is that even a novelette. Should I not be reviewing these titles individually).

All of the characters have colors for names. Real names are reserved for referenced movie stars and the characters they play, or for the disguises main character Blue dons. So what? Yeah, so what.

I said existentialism (cause that’s what it says on the ironic “pulp” style cover of the novel: “A Penguin Existential Mystery.” But all the critics say “post-modern.” Here. I think “post-modern” means “A writer who’s been published before has been published again and since other folks said what he wrote was good this must be good too but we don’t get it at all but we still have to say we do or we look like idiots.”

Apparently, we have entered the post-post-modern age, thank goodness. Nevertheless, on for me to the next one in this Trilogy. I wonder if it will also have a guy watching a guy and losing himself.

View all my reviews

City of Glass by Paul Auster
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

The writer mentions Through the Looking Glass, and so glass means mirror. Why not call the novel “City of Mirrors”? Because that’s too obvious. I guess. This is my introduction to my review of the first novel in Paul Auster’s New York Trilogy.

A thousand years ago, or maybe fifteen or so, I interviewed P.J. Rondinone, a writer in New York who’d studied with Barthelme. We talked about how Rondinone took Barthelme’s stories and New-Yorked them, a legitimate enterprise, as Barthelme talked about when talking about Borges talking about Menard re-writing Don Quixote. Now, I’ve never read Don Quixote, so I didn’t know, at the time, that Cervantes himself claimed that Don Quixote was actually written by Cid Hemete Benengeli. I went on, myself to write a rewrite of Rondinone’s re-write; I office-cubicled one of his New-Yorked stories.

I’ll not be doing the same with City of Glass, this review notwithstanding. Paul Auster mentions Don Quixote in this novel, and his character Daniel Quinn is a New-Yorked Cervantes. Not a New-Yorked Quixote—Daniel Quinn is himself a writer, you see. And so is Paul Auster (the minor character in the novel). Daniel Quinn gets a phone call, a wrong number, falls through the mirror, and Alice-in-Wonderlands through his own creation: a New York of characters.

It’s a miasma, an existential mess, characters scattered by the god Auster (not the minor character in the novel) like mankind scattered at Babel. By the end, The writer gets mad at himself for not caring about his characters more, robbing them of hunger, taking away their sunlight, abandoning them, both literally and literarily.

A very expertly constructed and unsatisfying read.

View all my reviews

The Guns of Avalon by Roger Zelazny
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Gave myself a few days “rest” (read other books) and jumped back into the Chronicles with book two, eagerly, a rainy morning fit for nothing else but reading. Finished a few hours later.

In book one (Nine Princes in Amber) Zelazney begins with amnesia, establishes conflict, allows the reader to discover just as the main character recovers his memories. Here in book two, there’s a new mystery, and now the reader is the main character’s partner, along for the ride to figure out what’s going on.

And what’s going on is that the very fabric with which these tales are told is threatened. The first half of the book is simple fantasy-warfare, fought in a realm of little (seeming) consequence. But the hero’s journey needs this land to persevere, if his soul is to be as noble as his blood. He can’t claim a birth right if he’s not worthy of it. And when he wins, his reward is the tools he needs to fight the real fight…

Although it’s not the fight he thinks it is. Which means, when he wins, he hasn’t won what he thought he’d won. To the victor the spoils? Yes, things have spoiled. By the victor’s own hand. What now, Corwin? How will you keep your victory from being merely pyrrhic?

I’ll be deep inside book three in a few days to find out. If I seem a little more cautious than I was at the end of book one, that’s only because there’s a lot more at stake here than some swashbuckling through a few hours of reading. The entire series is at risk.

View all my reviews

Five Star Billionaire by Tash Aw
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Four people dealing with Shanghai—the book jacket will tell you five, but one of them is Shanghai, for all intents and purposes. He’s the ostensible narrator, in his own sections, the giver of unsolicited, but not unwanted advice. His platitudes are chapter titles, and they amount to a reluctant resistance to existential angst.

The other four are narrated in third person, intimacy held at arm’s length. We Westerners will call them inscrutable, that word laced with a little less racism than the erstwhile “Oriental.” But this is the Occident in the East, now, this new Shanghai, same as they old Shanghai, to steal a line from that currently-revered band from the 70s. Or 60s. Or whatever—it was before my time.

This Shanghai is all too familiar to those of us, readers, who’ve experienced The Character of A City through books. This new China is New York, is New Angeles, is New ‘Cago. (Sorry, I’m trying to be inventive. I’m not doing a good job. I’m a foreigner her myself). Themes of aliens but not alienation run through Aw’s novel, copy cats without simulacrum, fate without destiny.

I liked the minor interweaving of the character’s lives in the novel, liked the small shifts in style Aw achieved between chapters. It got a bit tedious towards the end, despite the all-to-predictable “surprise” (not enough of a pay-off to justify the tedium, but then I don’t think that the surprise was intended to be any kind of pay-off or climax; see above, re: fate without destiny). There were a few places, maybe, where a character’s own character shift was a bit sudden… but I didn’t mind that so much.

Read this because it’s on the Booker prize long-list for 2013. I don’t think it will make the short list, (read this review post-October and see if I’m right) but I’m still glad I read it.

View all my reviews

Harvest by Jim Crace
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Novels set in tiny rural villages are quiet, contemplative, maybe even gentle. Not this one. There’s a quietness and a contemplativeness, but there’s no gentleness; this is a violent, frustrating, challenging little novel.

Crace is an expert at setting a tone and a mood, almost immediately. We’re made intimate observers of the action, via his narrator, who himself is 12 years in the commonwealth but still not completely accepted by its people. In this way we’re explained what needs to be explained, but not over much so. Details like names and dates are left out, adding to the intimacy, making this less a chronicle and more a memory. All within a rich, almost-but-not-quite inscrutable vocabulary peculiar to the setting.

We’re tugged along by the narrator’s urges, in a place where humans are little better than animals. His libido colors some of his wonderings, leading him astray in though if not in deed. But there’s a poignancy there too, witnessing the kind of injustice that only humans can invent, and the fatal consequences of that invention.

Every year I try to read as many books from the Booker long list as possible, with mixed results. A few bad ones (in my opinion) a few good ones, a few great ones. Last year it was Hilary Mantel’s Bring up the Bodies; this year’s it’s Jim Crace’s Harvest. I’m looking forward to going back and reading his other award-winning writing.

View all my reviews

Nine Princes in Amber by Roger Zelazny
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I’m trying to decide if I should review this title as a stand-alone novel, or the entire series as one. Or both? How about both. Okay, both.

Begin with a man coming out of a coma, with no memory. A clean slate for the reader, a way to get some action started without requiring a lot of set-up. Toss in conflict– someone wants him to stay asleep. Add some texture– his “recovery” is borderline miraculous. At this point, the writer is free to make it up as he goes along.

And the reader may even suspect as much. But this is just the shadow of truth, and as the main character rediscovers himself, the reader discovers the wonderfully detailed universe the writer has in store.

The reader, appetite whetted, becomes ravenous. In the reader’s hand, a feast! But is it more than he can chew? 10 volumes? But he must. The reading is too good. The adventures too rich, the impulse for justice to strong.

This is the the first book in the Amber Chronicles. And as stories go, it even stands alone, if you want it to– the hero doesn’t exactly win, but he perseveres. Zelazny manages to balance the ending just right– the reader can stop where the hero escapes… or plunge into the next book, explore the deep potential of the world Zelazny has created, lock arms with the hero and pledge to stay by his side until he triumphs or dies trying.

This reader can’t wait to continue.

View all my reviews

Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth by Reza Aslan
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Yeah, I saw the Fox interview, etc etc.

Lots of controversy around this book, lots of jibber-jabbing. And if that sounds irreverent, that’s just how this subject is always treated, this Jesus person; so entrenched is Western civilization in the Christian myth, any book would be controversial and by many measures irreverent. We’ve reached a point where you’re either offended that a person would question the truth of Christ’s sacrifice or you’re offended that a person would pay any heed to such poppy-cock.

Enter Reza Aslan. No matter what he says in the book, he’s wrong. Right? Like a pop star who’s entertainment value is her off-stage antics moreso than her songs, more words will be written about Dr. Aslan than he wrote in the book itself. Questions about his authority, his motivations, his sources, the over-all impact his book will have. Well, here it is. This is his impact.

This is the impact religion has, anymore, on anyone. We’re no longer a nation of believers, skipped right past being a nation of questioners; we’re nothing but a nation of commentators. This internet age, this media age, is an age of viewing, judging, passing on.

And who am I to do otherwise? I was more interested to learn that Aslan has a degree in creative writing. If his scholarship adds nothing all that new to the historical Jesus story, his writing ability certainly does. Aslan weaves a compelling history, and doesn’t damn with faint praise—while he may brush up against irreverence, that’s only in the eye of the beholder, and in my opinion his treatment of the life and times of Jesus is more respectful than anything else.

It’s a book worth reading, not because it will be a good weapon against those froth-mouthed Christers, and not because it buoys allegiance to scripture, but because it’s a helluva story, written well. Enough said.

View all my reviews

End Zone by Don DeLillo
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Another DeLillo novel, another book I probably didn’t get. What do you call someone who reads a lot of the same thing—an aficionado, an expert, a scholar? I want to get the right word; you see, I know this guy’s who’s read a lot of DeLillo, and he’s already a scholar, as he’s a professor, but I don’t think he teaches DeLillo specifically. But this guy I know, he’s really really smart. And so I read these book and I don’t get it and I must be such a disappointment.

Actually, I’m sure he doesn’t care. And look, I am not taking pride in this ignorance of mine, but then I’m not really ashamed, either. Pages of details on a table-top war-game scenario. Long paragraphs of self-indulgent psychophilosophizing. Is this hypermodern writing, is that what this is? And all I wanted was the football scenes.

Which were pretty good. So let me do this, let me rail against the back-cover copy of the edition I read, which says “Among some of the players, the terminologies of football and nuclear war—the language of end zones—become interchangeable, and their meaning deteriorates as the collegiate year runs its course.” Bullshit!

I know some folks like to point out how football and war have the same vocabulary. But that’s a convenience, barely worth writing a whole book about, and certainly an insult to soldiers and players alike. And in as much as I claim I didn’t “get it,” I can assure you, the terminologies of football and nuclear war do NOT become interchangeable, and the title has nothing to do with either.

Read Don DeLillo, if you like Don DeLillo. Read End Zone if you like that aspect of football, the grit and the silliness, the earnestness of its most dedicated losers. But don’t give me any crap, whether you do or don’t get it, like me, about its language. Words are just words.

View all my reviews

The Westing Game by Ellen Raskin
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I’m not sure how many times I’ve read The Westing Game now. Half a dozen or so. Probably read it a half-dozen times or more again, eventually. This time around I was reminded of it by a TV show. My wife was watching the summer-running reality show “Whodunnit.” I was reluctant to join in, but was eventually hooked. It’s cheesy, over produced, over edited, and not quality television at all. But it was fun, and it reminded me of the excellent novel by Raskin, so I’m not going to knock it too much.

The great thing about The Westing Game is, of course, it’s re-readability, which is really saying something for a mystery novel based on a very specific sort of puzzle. It’s the minor characters I always forget about. Like Doctor Deere, who turns out to be a decent guy. And Mrs Hoo, supplying the necessary red-herring moments.

This is a novel to give to someone who you like a lot, a young person from whom you expect great things. Someone curious. Not just a reader—a re-reader. Someone with whom you want to share the joys of mystery and discovery. Me, as soon as I got hooked on “Whodunnit,” I knew I wanted my wife to read this book. I’ll let you know what she thinks.

View all my reviews

Fludd by Hilary Mantel
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I, like other reviewers, read Mantel’s Booker-prize winning novels, and was awed by their genius. When browsing my local library, espying a thin tome by Mantel, plucking it up was done automatically. And I was not in the least disappointed. That same mastery of language. That same reverence, disguised as irreverence. Deeply serious, but funny, the way only deeply serious things can be.

As to Fludd himself, the character, well. There’s overt references to angels in the novel, and so I guess we’re supposed to make out that he’s some sort of super natural creature. You know, a very human kind of super natural creature. But I kept seeing demon, not angel. That’s hard to justify, given the way events in the novel play out. So I’ll try to do so in this way: religion is man-made, is a folly of fear, and so, angels and demons are not real. A demon, then, isn’t necessarily the evil being that a religion would have us believe.

Neither would an angel be. But in so far as a religion is not real, it nevertheless is structured by very real emotions in our hearts (and spleens). Angels are messengers, demons are seducers. And there it is, Fludd the seducer, the facilitator of emancipation from the outright silliness of religion.

Specifically, Catholicism. Every time I read a book with Catholics in it, it’s either reverential, and has almost no information, or it’s caustically critical, and rife with absurdity. I find it hard to believe that intelligent human beings actually believe this stuff. But they do, and they let it rule their souls, and mire them in misery, and any angel sent to free someone from such misery must, by the rules of the structures of that fake religion, come formed as a demon.

So that’s what I got from Fludd. But you can probably tell I’m anti-church as it is. Fludd preaching to the choir, then.

View all my reviews