Fahrenheit 145

fiction by Jason Edwards

Halberd Donson spent January on Gulliver Street, pork-chopping his way through every restaurant between 123rd and 198th. Most of them served pork chops, and when they didn’t, he brought his own. In a little baggie, in his jacket pocket. Sometimes it was a few days old if he’d had a good run. Only one place had had a problem with this.

Halberd walked in, was greeted by the hostess, a chubby little number in a red dress that had been tight before she’d been dumped and found a new boyfriend called carrot marble  ice-cream cake. She handed him the menu, told him his server would be right with him, and put a little wiggle in her impressive back-side as she sashayed away. Halberd was not impressed, but not displeased: in another world, another month, different street, he’d have merrily grabbed a handful of that derriere and wished it a happy life the next morning.

A man is made out of his experiences, so such musings where not to be dismissed, but he was in Buck’s Diner for a different reason, and there was no pork chop on the menu. He understood there not being pork chops on the menu in a Chinese, or a Mexico, or one of the places that serve the small plates that end up costing you more somehow. But a diner that didn’t have pork chops on the menu? Maybe the tuna melt was something to write home about and regulars didn’t bother with the chop.

Fine. The waitress stopped by and he ordered a salad and an extra plate. The table had ketchup and mustard bottles, but not sauce– he asked if they had sauce. She explained that the salad came with dressing, and he knew he was in for a night of trouble.

Herself, the waitress, world-weary and willing to show it. Bottle-brassy hair, curly like she meant business, set of shoulders on her from humping plates for twenty years. Her pantyhose were industrial strength, her shoes were sensible, her husband was okay if they managed to not spend too much time together, and her kid was making decent grades and paying his own way through city college. Had an earring, but what are you going to do. She had a tattoo, so who was she to judge.

Halberd decided not to prevaricate. He hauled his spare chop out of his pocket and showed it to her. It’s for this, he said. The sauce.

The waitress frowned. You can’t bring that in here, she said.

Halberd nodded. Look, I won’t stiff you on the tip. You can even up-charge me on the salad, if you want. Better yet, I’ll have a tuna melt, to go. How’s that?

She bit her bottom lip, chewed on it mostly. She’d been late to her shift, not her fault, the god damned busses in this town. And the night manager giving her attitude. She’d been here longer than him, could do his job if she wanted to. Not that she did. Not that the owner would let her. A woman restaurant manager. Think of it.

So she was in no mood. Look pal. It’s a health-code violation. You don’t like it? Take it up with city hall. And then stared at him, stared at the chop, willing it to go back into his pocket.

He probably shouldn’t have, but he did: Halberd stared right back at her, right in her eyes. Tired eyes, crows feet, seen a thing or two. (Who’s? Both of ’em.) He pulled the chop out of the baggie, held it delicately, pinkie in the air, and never breaking his gaze on her, took a bite.

The flush that came to her cheeks. The sour that built up in her stomach. The streak of hot lead that shot up and down her spine. She probably shouldn’t have, but she did: the waitress slapped the chop out his hand. It went flying, landed on an empty table.

Halberd wasn’t shocked or anything. Just a little sad. He knew she didn’t mean nothin’ by it. He knew she was probably just having a day. He only had himself to blame; he should have prevaricated. Should have just eaten the chop furtively, in his hand, hiding it in his jacket between bites.

Still, there were plenty of waitressing jobs. Maybe he was doing her a favor. Maybe she’d move on to something better. Then again, maybe not. But Halberd couldn’t let that change things. He had a goal: to eat a pork chop on every restaurant on Gulliver street between 123rd and 198th. He got up and left.

To her credit, the waitress let him go. She didn’t bother telling anyone about it. The busboy, who spoke about as much English as the president ate fried pickle sandwiches (none, in case you don’t know who the president is) picked up the chop when he bussed a few other tables and didn’t think a thing about it.

At about 2 AM, Halberd made sure no one was in there when he set the fire. He was not a cruel man.

Make Conversation Great Again

I posted this as a “Note” on Facebook, since I easily have a better chances of someone’s reading it there than here. But I’ll post it here too, for posterity).

Having a discussion—or an argument—with someone, without mutual respect, is just fighting. And in my opinion, pointless; you might as well be two dogs barking at each other.

And if you’re fighting with someone who is pro-Trump, or pro-Sanders, or pro-Cruz, or pro-Clinton, you will only further their resolve. That’s right: you will make them even more sure of themselves, more dedicated to ideals that you oppose.

So, if you know someone who is for a candidate you despise, you need to start the conversation with respect. This doesn’t mean you have to respect the candidate: just respect the person you’re talking to.

“But how can I respect people who don’t respect me?” Good question. But the people you’re fighting with are asking that question too. Maybe if you offer some respect, some of them will do the same. Eventually.

(This won’t be at all easy, and I’m not saying I am even up to the task myself. Which is why, when I can muster the restraint, I choose not to speak at all. I don’t want to add fire to the bellies of those I disagree with.)

Things are more heated than ever in all of the political discussion forums. From Facebook to Reddit to the comments section underneath any news article. It is up to us to see to it that these discussions yield positive results.

Find common ground. Ask questions. Cite your sources. Re-read everything you write several times before clicking that “post” button.

(And by the way, this is not directed at anyone in particular, for anything you’ve posted or said. I’ve had this on my mind for a while, and I’m still trying to find the best way to articulate it. Nor am I the first person to have these ideas—I’m just trying to put them in my own words.)

Thank you for reading the above.

Review: No Game For a Dame

No Game For a Dame
No Game For a Dame by M. Ruth Myers
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

A hard-boiled detective novel—but hey, the dick’s a dame! How about that for a twist? Yeah, well, as “neat” as that is, I don’t know if it’s that big of a deal.

Which is not to say this was a bad novel. It’s your basic procedural, your basic private-eye story, with many of the tropes we enjoy, the reason we read these things. The language, the attitude, the seedy bars, the gangsters, the run-ins with the cops. Maggie Sullivan delivers.

Then there’s the new stuff, the stuff you don’t get in the male version. Knitting needles, elaborate hats, a boarding house for women only. Don’t worry, none of it’s sexist or derivative. Just part of the tapestry, and used in the execution of detective duties.

There’s maybe a little too much misogyny tossed around for my tastes. I mean, yeah, sure, that’s the way it was back then, but I don’t read these detective stories for the history lesson. Feels less like an attempt at verisimilitude and more like self-indulgence. Like, I’m supposed to respect this dame more because she solves crimes and has to deal with institutional sexism.

No thanks. I’d rather just read a good story. And No Game for a Dame is a good story, more or less. The question I have to ask myself is, would this story have worked if the main character had been a guy? Sure— so on the one hand, kudos for not making this merely a by-gals-for-gals thing.

But on the other hand, why bother with the title, then? Look, I haven’t read a lot of women-as-private-eye novels. But it seems to me that there’s gotta be more one could do than just throw a female into a by-the-numbers paperback and add a little sexist window-dressing for good measure.

Then again, maybe that’s me being sexist. Bottom line—if you’re looking from some kind of feminist screed, give this one a pass. But if you’re looking for a decent little crime novel, go right ahead.

View all my reviews